3 ms·
Thanks for clarifying this! The best way I've been able to intuitively understand it is that all worlds are internally consistent and causal, but the observatio
by drc500free 4y ago
Thanks for clarifying this! The best way I've been able to intuitively understand it is that all worlds are internally consistent and causal, but the observation that causes us to split away from some worlds can be after the fact. That doesn't make it possible to come up with a superposition of worlds that breaks causality.
Is that correct(ish)?