3 ms·
> But constant tearing up of streets isn't necessary for life No city has literally all the streets torn up at once. Which means by definition all road constru
by seoaeu 4y ago
> But constant tearing up of streets isn't necessary for life
No city has literally all the streets torn up at once. Which means by definition all road construction is in stages. I’m somewhat puzzled how what you’re proposing is different from the status quo
- pooper 4y agoI'd say we need more construction, more frequently based on comments I've read here, resealing or resurfacing a street more frequently is cheaper than waiting for streets to give up the ghost? This also means we need alternate routes or extra lanes or some kind of redundancy which asked this kind of work? So higher taxes?