4 ms·
> just wait until this type of thing is deployed on demand and at scale South India averages 4 movies a week. Each movie has like 5 songs. So in a year you nee
by dxbydt 4y ago
> just wait until this type of thing is deployed on demand and at scale
South India averages 4 movies a week. Each movie has like 5 songs. So in a year you need lyrics for atleast 1000 songs. Sure, lyricists are creative artists, but not that creative. So you hear a lot of catchy songs which have some AI input. Here’s a song with 45 million views - I don’t think a human wrote all of it because it’s mostly garbage, but very catchy, so most likely AI augmented.
https://youtu.be/MJmxdlCtFWU https://youtu.be/MJmxdlCtFWU
Only an AI would write something like - 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2, i love u 2 really i love u 2.
- bombcar 4y agoSomeone had to take the time to perform the song, there's no reason they wouldn't take a few minutes to change/improve the lyrics, even if an AI produced it. I suspect it is not AI produced and simply a simple song.
- pessimizer 4y agoYou wouldn't even need your toes to count the number or people who sang like 80% of the songs in Bollywood film history. A random google claims that Kishore Kumar sang 2905 songs, Lata Mangeshkar somewhere around 25 thousand, and Asha Bhosle around 12 thousand. The time taken to perform a song doesn't have to be much. edit: that being said, the choreography probably took 50x as much work as the song.
- WalterBright 4y agoSong lyrics aren't hard. Consider: A B C It's as easy as 1 2 3 A B C A B C You and me! Or this gem: A E A E I O U you and sometimes Why! Both songs were hits.
- throwawaylinux 4y agoThe lottery isn't hard either, it's just a handful of simple numbers. Consider: 10 19 40 45 58 25 Or: 20 36 53 56 69 16 Both worth several hundred million dollars.
- djmips 4y agoI don't agree there are plenty of songs with nonsense lyrics pre-AI like (Da Da Da - Trio - 1981) -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oef68YabD0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oef68YabD0