> It really boils down on how many people need how much resources and how many people produce these resources. You can argue over who should be your bourgeoisie

> It really boils down on how many people need how much resources and how many people produce these resources. You can argue over who should be your bourgeoisie, should it be (...) How about we don't succumb to the desire to pull strawmen and focus on simple things to accomplish such as being able to make a honest living that leaves you with disposable income after covering all your cost of living with a simple 9-to-5 job? Where does this need to create the illusion that there is possibly no grey area between a homeless slacker and a glorious millionaire investor? Is it too much to ask the most prosperous economy in the history of the world to allow workers to actually live a modest life with your salary? Otherwise, why would those workers continue to support that absurd society?