3 ms·
Ah yes, plain text. So, not responsive at all, needing constant side swiping on mobile and unnecessary eye strain on desktop due to no word wrapping on larger s
by lloydatkinson 4y ago
Ah yes, plain text. So, not responsive at all, needing constant side swiping on mobile and unnecessary eye strain on desktop due to no word wrapping on larger screens.
At the very least use these 100 bytes of CSS so it’s readable.
https://www.swyx.io/css-100-bytes https://www.swyx.io/css-100-bytes
- motogpjimbo 4y agoIf only the mobile computing revolution had been based around the form factor of the Psion Series 5...
- zzo38computer 4y agoI do not agree. I prefer it to not have any such CSS, and then I can specify what CSS I want, myself, if any; and otherwise have the client software make it suitable itself, for the width of its display, user's specified font sizes, colours (which may be different if a print out is made on paper, or if using a monochrome display), etc. (I find the default styles are mostly suitable.)
- lloydatkinson 4y agoOkay and now please list some browsers that are both wide spread and allow users to “specify their own CSS” for a site. There is absolutely nothing wrong with allowing a sane default that works for the 99.9% of people. The page already uses some crappy CSS that forces dark mode. Surely that isn’t OK if the user should be the one to need to supply their own CSS to use a site.
- lloydatkinson 4y agoThought so.