3 ms·
>The point is that there is always an elite or wealthy class, pick which group you like best. Citations required I do not agree whatsoever, just because you d
by feet 4y ago
>The point is that there is always an elite or wealthy class, pick which group you like best.
Citations required
I do not agree whatsoever, just because you don't have the imagination to come up with a better system for organizing labor and resources doesn't mean it isn't possible
- heretogetout 4y agoHow would you organize labor and resources such that there is no elite class? How do you enforce whatever rules are required and ensure that those enforcers don't become the elite themselves (if nobody else..)?
- slothtrop 4y agoI'm not holding my breath. As of yet, no one has had the imagination. This has become a fav piece of rhetoric by ancoms who believe complex supply lines, infrastructure and essential services could be maintained, let alone improved upon, with a "flat hierarchy" society doing away with representative democracy. No one can take that seriously. The universe hates a vacuum and you can be sure that, as in the past, if goons have an opening to seize power under the guise of Communism, with their party being the only legitimate, then they will. Removing checks and balances will do that.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- upsidesinclude 4y agoCitations aren't required, a basic knowledge of history, though, that is required and what you lack. The idea, your idea is that there's a way to tell everybody what to do to make all the things work and everyone will follow the plan and like their spot in it. You lack the imagination to recognize individual will let alone the fact that society works because there are millions of experts making choices everyday. No central planning board to 'organize' 'labor' can accomplish that or house the knowledge of these individuals