2 ms·
It's a bit of an odd one to search for because both the title and site are different. I wouldn't have found the original either. (And, in fact, didn't! It was o
by jml7c5 4y ago
It's a bit of an odd one to search for because both the title and site are different. I wouldn't have found the original either. (And, in fact, didn't! It was only because I knew the previous submission was to Jacobin that I could locate it.)
- jonas21 4y agoThe site in today's submission seems to have copied the original article wholesale and slapped their own byline on it, along with a bunch of ads. The only credit to the original author is at the very bottom, and that's probably accidental (it was mixed in with the article content in the original).
- dang 4y agoThanks for pointing that out. We've banned the site.