4 ms·
People often think that controlling for the percentage of Fortune 500 CEOs that are women, which would reduce the gender pay gap one calculates, is not reasonab
by anonymoushn 4y ago
People often think that controlling for the percentage of Fortune 500 CEOs that are women, which would reduce the gender pay gap one calculates, is not reasonable, because perhaps "Women are much less likely to be Fortune 500 CEOs" is an actual part of the gender pay gap. You are suggesting controlling for the percentage of slaves that are women. It seems like we ought to control for both slave status and Fortune 500 CEO status or for neither.
- dataflow 4y agoI thought the gender pay gap was supposed to be about "when M and F take on the same job titles, on average M gets paid $X more than F"... was it not? Otherwise it sounds more like a "gender title gap" or "gender job disparity" or something like that, than a "gender pay gap".
- zmgsabst 4y ago> gender pay gap was supposed to be about "when M and F take on the same job titles, on average M gets paid $X more than F"... was it not? It was not. The “gender pay gap” is comparing the average female pay to the average male pay, not comparing like for like. One of the main contributors to the purported pay gap is career choice — which is also captured in the BLS statistic that men are 92% of workplace deaths. Talking about a “pay gap” without discussing the “death gap” has always been dishonest.
- kube-system 4y agoThe widely cited 78 or 79 cents on the dollar figure does not take job choice into account. Adjusted for job title, it is 95 cents.