3 ms·
I seriously doubt any of the people let go are remotely near the critical path for the Mars mission. In fact, certain kinds of persons are prone to stir up the
by User23 4y ago
I seriously doubt any of the people let go are remotely near the critical path for the Mars mission.
In fact, certain kinds of persons are prone to stir up these kinds of issues to distract from their own poor performance in their actual job. Which evidently isn’t internal “activism.”
The level of entitlement it takes to expect to be paid to undermine the organization that’s paying one ought to be shocking, but it evidently isn’t.
- trs8080 4y agoThis is a lot of baseless conjecture tied up with a nice insult at the end. > The level of entitlement it takes to expect to be paid to undermine the organization that’s paying one ought to be shocking, but it evidently isn’t. The employees literally wrote a letter saying an individual's actions were undermining the organization. The letter is an exhortation to protect SpaceX (in terms of finance and reputation) from Musk's behavior.
- quartesixte 4y agoTo add to the “protecc SpaceX” line of thought, I think there is some level of disconnect as well — Elon, while a champion for SpaceX’s cause and its public figurehead, and still involved in the decisions the company makes, isn’t the main showrunner. Gywnne Shotwell is. So as much as Elon is publicly the King of SpaceX, Gywnne runs the kingdom and some subjects wanted some reform. Also, SpaceX definitely has spun itself up as a “this is for the good of all humanity” type company and attracts employees who really are bought-in on the whole Grand Vision. To the writers of this letters, that Grand Vision > Elon the Person.
- evandale 4y agoSo did Shotwell terminate the employees or did Musk? If Shotwell runs the company then why is Musk getting the heat?
- henriquez 4y ago
- samhyde69 4y ago
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]