3 ms·
I'd love to hear Mr. Musk define what he means by the term. I'm not the one claiming to be a free speech absolutist, he is. I for instance am not a free speec
by VikingCoder 4y ago
I'd love to hear Mr. Musk define what he means by the term. I'm not the one claiming to be a free speech absolutist, he is.
I for instance am not a free speech absolutist. I think it's okay to deplatform people who are spreading misinformation about a global pandemic, or an election. But Mr. Musk apparently thinks that's bad.
So, we get to find out where he draws the line that he claims he doesn't have.
- arghnoname 4y agoIn the context of the current debate, I think a good faith reading of someone claiming to be a 'free speech absolutist' would be to interpret the internet as a public forum that is protected by speech guarantees enshrined by the first amendment despite the fact that they're hosted by private corporations. It probably doesn't mean child porn is okay. It probably doesn't mean direct exhortations of violence against specific individuals is okay. It's fair to say he can be more explicit in his definition, but it's easier for us to have a conversation if we try to interpret one another charitably. The real test for whether or not Musk is being a hypocrite is whether or not he censors critics of him on Twitter. That is an apples to apples comparison. I think it's fair to say that continuing to pay people who criticize you is a different matter.
- VikingCoder 4y agoI think it's also fair to say that "absolutist" is not a correct term for him to use to describe himself.