4 ms·

This is really cool. Never heard of vale until today. Is there a vim plugin that can take advantage of it? I don't use neovim and never plan to.

by mempko 4y ago

alpaca128 4y ago
A quick search got me `vim-compiler-vale`, which seems to do exactly that.
aidenn0 4y ago
vim-ale[1] combines a LSP client with the ability to shell out to linters and supports vale 1: https://github.com/dense-analysis/ale/blob/master/supported-tools.md https://github.com/dense-analysis/ale/blob/master/supported-...
tombert 4y ago
Out of curiosity, and this isn't meant to be passive aggressive or anything, but why the resistance to NeoVim?
- joemi 4y ago
  I'm not the person you asked, but in my case it's mostly a "if it's not broke, don't fix it" situation. I don't need neovim since vim is just fine for me. There are a few neovim-only plugins I wouldn't mind trying out sometime, but I don't need them, and I use very few plugins so they probably wouldn't make the cut for me anyway. And there aren't any neovim-only features I care about (besides mild interest in a few plugins). That's what most of my personal "resistance" is about. The rest is due to fact that I'm still a little bitter from some bad interactions with some early neovim developers and fans.
- teruakohatu 4y ago
  I have an old vim config that I haven't had motivation to switch over to Neovim. I find configuration frameworks, which are so popular right now, a lot of work to understand and not very flexible/opinionated. Lastly, vim is usually available everywhere, so I am just a git clone away from having my configuration deployed.
- halostatue 4y ago
  There’s no good replacement for gvim / MacVim. I’ve tried all the GUIs that compile for the Mac. I can’t stand a single one of them. I can’t stand using vim / nvim on the terminal for most of my editing. Not sure why, but that’s my reasoning.

This is really cool. Never heard of vale until today. Is there a vim plugin that can take advantage of it? I don't use neovim and never plan to.

by mempko 4y ago

This is really cool. Never heard of vale until today. Is there a vim plugin that can take advantage of it? I don't use neovim and never plan to.

alpaca128 4y ago

A quick search got me `vim-compiler-vale`, which seems to do exactly that.

aidenn0 4y ago

vim-ale[1] combines a LSP client with the ability to shell out to linters and supports vale 1: https://github.com/dense-analysis/ale/blob/master/supported-tools.md https://github.com/dense-analysis/ale/blob/master/supported-...

tombert 4y ago

Out of curiosity, and this isn't meant to be passive aggressive or anything, but why the resistance to NeoVim?

joemi 4y ago
I'm not the person you asked, but in my case it's mostly a "if it's not broke, don't fix it" situation. I don't need neovim since vim is just fine for me. There are a few neovim-only plugins I wouldn't mind trying out sometime, but I don't need them, and I use very few plugins so they probably wouldn't make the cut for me anyway. And there aren't any neovim-only features I care about (besides mild interest in a few plugins). That's what most of my personal "resistance" is about. The rest is due to fact that I'm still a little bitter from some bad interactions with some early neovim developers and fans.
teruakohatu 4y ago
I have an old vim config that I haven't had motivation to switch over to Neovim. I find configuration frameworks, which are so popular right now, a lot of work to understand and not very flexible/opinionated. Lastly, vim is usually available everywhere, so I am just a git clone away from having my configuration deployed.
halostatue 4y ago
There’s no good replacement for gvim / MacVim. I’ve tried all the GUIs that compile for the Mac. I can’t stand a single one of them. I can’t stand using vim / nvim on the terminal for most of my editing. Not sure why, but that’s my reasoning.