For a maximal hypercapitalist corporation? Well, yeah. For as long as they are (seen as) trivially replaceable, an employee that sees a doctor, or has health c

For a maximal hypercapitalist corporation? Well, yeah. For as long as they are (seen as) trivially replaceable, an employee that sees a doctor, or has health concerns, or uses benefits of any kind, or really has any slip in their productivity even to the slightest degree is a poorer worker than one that doesn't. This stops working if you run out of people to hire, or if the cost of hiring increases past a certain threshold. It is the most rational way for the dominant corporation in the current economic system to act, if they can get away with it.