2 ms·
Yep, I absolutely expect that. Especially on the example page.
by xbryanx 15y ago
Yep, I absolutely expect that. Especially on the example page.
- wavephorm 15y agoSo now you have 2 problems: 1) Your website requires backwards compatibility 2) It's not his problem Better whine and complain on the internet until someone fixes your problems for you.
- gren 15y agoProblem solved: It's very easy to handle a Javascript fallback for Slider.js: Instead of having an empty container in which your slider will be templated, put the content for the non-javascript into it. That's it ;) Just because the Slider Javascript will empty the content of it ;) (Side thought: maybe I'm wrong, but in 2011, are we still need a JS backwards?)