It has not been editorialized at all, let alone overly editorialized. The author outlines the consequences of a very Ill-thought-out law that will harm the worl

It has not been editorialized at all, let alone overly editorialized. The author outlines the consequences of a very Ill-thought-out law that will harm the worldwide web, not protect users, and damage what is left of the UKs standing in the world. Telling the truth is never “overly” doing anything. Sometimes, you must call a spade “a spade” Do you have some information to contribute to the discussion or are you suggesting that the author should lie instead?