11 ms·
Steve Jobs' memo to startups
- kalleboo 15y agoSource? edit: did some googling and it's from the biography. This is what I hate about tumblr. It's all completely random stuff with no context, no sourcing and no discussion, just those pointless reblog "notes" edit2: of course, biography not autobiography, dunno what I was thinking
- edash 15y agoThis isn't hosted on Tumblr, it's Wordpress. And Tumblr's done lots of great work around attribution: http://staff.tumblr.com/post/1059624418/content-attribution http://staff.tumblr.com/post/1059624418/content-attribution
- Aqua_Geek 15y agoThe article is a repost of this Tumblr post: http://daslee.tumblr.com/post/12161787609/steve-jobs-on-startups http://daslee.tumblr.com/post/12161787609/steve-jobs-on-star... (look at the "via" link at the bottom), which is apparently taken from the biography.
- prostoalex 15y agoWhich autobiography?
- kenjackson 15y agoIt's actually a biography -- the new one by Isaacson called "Steve Jobs".
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- sax 15y agoPerhaps this is nitpicking, in this day and age. But that's his biography (as opposed to autobiography). BTW, how would you do things differently than reblog "notes"?
- aangjie 15y agoIt's not nitpicking to me... it(autobio vs bio) does make a huge difference even in this age.
- funkah 15y agoHuh? What does Tumblr have to do with anything?
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- alexwolfe 15y agoSo true. This term seems to be abused more than ever now a days. I've seen too many people who are just starting a company (literally), throw this term around. It's not something to be proud of unless you have something to be proud of.
- smacktoward 15y agoThe crazy thing is that you hear people talking about how they've "started a company" when they haven't figured out how to make their new operation do the primary thing a company does, which is MAKE MONEY. If you're not making money, you're not a company. You're a collection of people that might be a company, someday.
- latch 15y agoYou are flat out wrong. Not every tech product/company/idea comes together in a weekend, a month or even a year. Companies doing new science can go for years, and even decades, without even having a product, let alone clients or revenue.
- erichocean 15y agoExactly. In my case, it'll have been ~15 years before I see any revenue at all for my company, Fohr, in 2013.
- untog 15y agoIf you're not making money, you're not a company. Uh? You're a company when you sign the paperwork to make a company. I get the sentiment behind what you're saying, but the statement doesn't make sense. If you're not making money, you're not a profitable company. But that ought to be reasonably obvious.
- philwelch 15y agoI guess Amazon wasn't a company until years after they went public.
- davidw 15y ago"Launch a company and cash in" is what YC owes its existence to, for another point of view... From PG's description, it doesn't seem like it was exactly easy.
- jwingy 15y agoSo what? I don't know what qualifies as 'cashing in', but there's more to life than just running a company. Just because you've decided not to stick around for 20-30 years doesn't mean everything you did up until then wasn't hard work.
- ticks 15y agoI don't think he's talking about hard work. He is talking about people who are driven by short term thinking. People who don't really care about their work.
- achompas 15y agoRight. For all of Apple's incredible work, this is a curious quote from a man who commissioned a biography because "I wanted my kids to know me," he said. "I wasn't always there for them, and I wanted them to know why and to understand what I did." [0] I don't judge him for his life choices, but growing a business is a serious commitment. Jobs is kind of ignoring that point. [0] http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/romenesko/148601/jobs-asked-isaacson-to-write-bio-in-2004-because-i-wanted-my-kids-to-know-me/ http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/romenesko/148601/jobs-ask...
- bomatson 15y agoEntrepreneur, defined: "A person who organizes and operates a business or businesses, taking on financial risk to do so" http://bit.ly/uMwlXV http://bit.ly/uMwlXV Much respect for entrepreneurs that see it through the whole road, but it doesn't make all the other brilliant entrepreneurs just 'unemployed'
- cgarvey 15y agoDoes this mean I should drop the title "Social Media Expert Bootstrapping Startup Entrepreneur" from my brushed-aluminum oversized business card?
- DavidChouinard 15y agoThis is my personal favourite quote of his: “The problem with the Internet startup craze isn’t that too many people are starting companies; it’s that too many people aren’t sticking with it. That’s somewhat understandable, because there are many moments that are filled with despair and agony, when you have to fire people and cancel things and deal with very difficult situations. That’s when you find out who you are and what your values are. So when these people sell out, even though they get fabulously rich, they’re gypping themselves out of one of the potentially most rewarding experiences of their unfolding lives. Without it, they may never know their values or how to keep their newfound wealth in perspective.”
- snarfy 15y agoThis from the guy who took the $5000 for breakout after Woz stayed up for 4 days straight fixing design issues caused by bad specs from Jobs. Fucking managers.
- lachyg 15y agoYou should read the biography to get some context and understanding. I'm not saying that that was wrong, or even that it actually happened, but I'd actually read it before making a comment like that.
- funkah 15y agoI've noticed some people can't let go of this, so dedicated are they to the idea that Jobs was a charismatic but otherwise worthless manager type. That he was all flash and no substance. A bullshitter. That's too bad.
- steve8918 15y agoSteve Jobs said to Woz that he personally couldn't remember this happening, but that if it happened, then he apologized. Kids do a lot of stupid things. I've done my share of stupid things as well in my early 20s. To vilify him for something he did 30+ years previous and for something he apologized for is ridiculous.
- nirvana 15y agoDo you have a citation for the "design issues" thing, or are you just making that up? It was over 4 days because Bushnell needed the game fast. The design was completely in Woz's hands and the incentive was to do it with as few chips as possible, also from Bushnell. Your claim that Jobs took all the money is a lie. The allegation is he split the original fee with Woz exactly as promised, and simply never told Woz about the bonus. The whole amount was less than $5,000. It amazes me that people are such Apple haters that they will resort to making up such lies in order to bash the guy who created the personal computer industry (along with woz) and helped create everything from the switching power supply to the smartphone.
- deleted 15y ago
- jpdoctor 15y ago“I hate it when people call themselves ‘entrepreneurs’ when what they’re really trying to do is launch a startup, so they can cash in and move on. Of course, this is exactly what is desired from the investor POV, so why the people they fund should act differently is a stretch.
- kenjackson 15y agoPG wrote a good post on this topic (a counterpoint I would argue). Unfortunately I can't find it. But it's about why selling your company makes sense -- why you should give it to people who are optimzied for running a business. Or something to that effect. Probably worth rereading if I could find it.
- pg 15y agoI think this may be the one you mean: http://paulgraham.com/prcmc.html http://paulgraham.com/prcmc.html
- amirmc 15y agoThe talk you link to in that essay leads to a 404. Is it this talk on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CDXJ6bMkMY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CDXJ6bMkMY)? If so, maybe you want to update the link.
- kenjackson 15y agoThat is the one. Looked right at the name in the list of essays and skipped it. Thanks Paul. Good to reread.
- pg 15y agoIt's an awkward title (I had to think myself "What was that one called?") but if I gave it the obvious title it would spoil the surprise ending.
- hedgehog 15y agoThere's a typo down in the credits (Jessica's name).
- pg 15y agoFixed; thanks.
- mosburger 15y ago
- noonespecial 15y agoI kind of think the opposite. Entrepreneurs are the ones that create viable businesses, cash in, and move on (usually to try to do it again.) Steve, on the other hand, created the mother of all lifestyle businesses. (for his value of lifestyle, of course)
- gizmo 15y agoI think that's stretching the definition of lifestyle business a bit much. Surely not every person who starts a business for the long haul is building a lifestyle business? A lifestyle business is a business you start in order to live a certain lifestyle. The dictionary definition talks about generating an income that is sufficient to sustain a lifestyle, but no more. Steve certainly didn't start Apple because he wanted to maintain a specific lifestyle.
- nirvana 15y agoI don't know if there's a definitive definition of "lifestyle business", but I've often seen this phrase used derogatorily, on hacker news, to dismiss any business not taking venture capital, not trying to be the next google, or not being built to flip. In a way, Apple is, then, a really good example of a "lifestyle business" as that term is used here. They didn't take a lot of venture capital, they weren't built to flip, and they weren't trying to be the next anything. They focused on long term business success. Choices made based on long term business success (Such as, retaining enough control to make sure the business doesn't get flipped against the founders will) often, on this site, results in the accusation that you're "just building a lifestyle business".
- philwelch 15y agoMaybe leading and inspiring talented people to build world-changing products was Steve's preferred lifestyle.
- pg 15y agoI can't say he was mistaken, since he was only saying he disliked it. But I don't think there's anything wrong with selling a company at any stage. Steve's problem with selling seemed to be that you're shirking work by doing it. But that isn't necessarily, or even usually, true. A lot of people who sell startups go on to do other things, and often bigger things. If we were still running Viaweb, we could not have started Y Combinator.
- runevault 15y agoProbably depends on if the idea is your one true dream, or just something you found interesting enough to invest the time/take the risk. That would have a huge impact on if the money is worth giving up being in control of the company/product's destiny.
- hkmurakami 15y agoI remember a quote from Startup School which went something along the lines of, "Don't pick an idea for the sole reason that it will allow you to do a start up. Find a problem that you're truly passionate about solving, and things will take care of themselves"
- runevault 15y agoI didn't catch the stream but I mostly agree with that advice. I do find myself wondering if it's worth doing any idea to build up capital for something else if you feel an idea has potential but you aren't sure you can sell it to investors without putting in a lot of time and money into it first to show the true potential.
- veyron 15y agoWhat he's criticizing is doing a startup specifically so that it could be flipped later. If you are in it to build a real company, you actually go through the hard work that Jobs is talking about. Did you start viaweb to sell it to someone else later, or did you start it to build an actual sustainable business?
- daimyoyo 15y agoWith this in mind I wonder why he chose to sell Pixar. While he made a tremendous amount of money from the sale, I don't think it was really enough to make a tremendous change in his lifestyle.
- T-zex 15y agoHe did not start the Pixar. He bought it and then sold it.
- sjwright 15y agoHalf true. He bought a division of LucasArts; it wasn't even called Pixar until the sale meant it needed its own name. The idea of Pixar being a feature length animated movie house wasn't even conceivable until Steve Jobs was there to negotiate with Disney for financing and distribution.
- amirmc 15y agoAs a result of the sale, he also became a major shareholder in Disney and joined the board. That might have had a bigger impact for him than just the monetary value from the sale.
- yardie 15y agoIndeed, I think people really underestimate the importance of having the Disney catalog in the iTunes store. And when I say Disney I mean Disney, ABC, Miramax and the other subsidiary studios.
- nirvana 15y agoHe sold Pixar, because it gave Ed Catmull and John Lasseter the opportunity to do what they'd always wanted to do, at Disney. Pixar was created because Disney was missing he market. When Disney bought them, the Pixar guys started running the show at Disney. Steve Jobs bought a small division of Lucas Arts that was going to be shut down otherwise, and, along with those guys and others turned it into Pixar for the purpose of realizing this market. When he sold it, it was a real company, and it enabled the cofounders of Pixar to pursue their dreams. It was a win-win.
- pittsburgh 15y agoBetween this post and comments from startup school along the same lines, there seems to be a lot of people complaining about founders looking to make a quick buck without having to work hard for it. I live in SF. I'm running a startup, and many of my friends are as well. Where are these lazy, get rich quick people I keep reading about? Am I just lucky to only be surrounded by hard-working entrepreneurs who are trying to build long-term viable businesses, or is this problem being overblown a little? This is me genuinely asking, not making a statement in question form.
- middus 15y agoWhat's wrong with looking to make a quick buck without having to work hard for it in the first place?
- anon808 15y agoThere's no rules, you can do whatever you want. But i think a lot of people have realized history shows the get rich quick type of folks tend not to actually contribute anything to human progress and more often than not are looking to take advantage of others for their own gain (allowing them to save time to riches). My question: Why would I ever want to deal with anyone like that, and why would anyone else?
- jarek 15y agoHow many people are actually contributing anything to human progress?
- anon808 15y agowho cares. all you can control is what you choose to do.
- omarchowdhury 15y agoMaybe one needs to take care of their own progress before they can take care of others?
- jnorthrop 15y agoI've always believed there are three kinds of entrepreneurs. 1) Those that want to build an empire from scratch. 2) Those that want to build to sell and retire rich. 3) Those that want to generate an income stream that will allow them to live the lifestyle of their choice (maybe working 3 days a week). All are valid and I consider all of them startups.
- antimora 15y agoFrom the Economics stand point, overall it's good that there are small start-ups whose sole purpose to succeed in some specialized area and later be bought off by a larger company that can use in some strategic maneuver. This is analogous to X-prize factor. In fact, Apple has benefited tremendously by buying off companies to enhance its products (e.g. touch screen). Had everyone out there decided to build long sustaining companies, there would had been large economic inefficiencies.
- HSO 15y agoThis is a very good point. Also, in my case, I know that there are some things I'd like to do that are almost impossible to do when you're small or it would be a complete waste to reinvent the wheel. Some biggies already have the technology I'd need to get closer to my dream, so I think the ideal path is to keep developing and getting a high profile in a niche that is under the radar and not easily replicable, and scope out potential buyers, not just by money offered but by product/vision fit. In short, it's a mental thing, not what happens on contract paper, that counts.
- shawnc 15y agoThe whole startup, get funding, sell the company idea is a new one to me - and yet i've been self-employed for close to 12 years. I had one job after High School, and that was working with my dad. So my opinion on this is likely not so valid - but I think that those that enter into it for the 'quick buck' are few and far between, and also those that succeed at it are even fewer. It's not the 'ideal' way to go about starting a business, and I don't think it's the norm either. It's a sweeping generalization - which is easiest to make and from reading his Bio, Steve's normal communication style as well.
- AndrewWarner 15y agoI don't see the attribution, so here it is: Walter Isaacson page 569 of the hard cover.
- textlaundry 15y agoApple wouldn't be alive without the existence of so-called "Cash Startups". The entire iLife suite, Siri, and a host of their other products came from buying out small companies. I wonder how Steve would have responded if the Dropbox guys showed him that quote in their negotiations.
- jbp 15y agoExactly, Steve wouldn't be back at Apple if he(Next) didn't sell out. No Apple A4/A5 if PASemi didn't sell out. No Siri either if Siri didn't sell out.
- mekoka 15y agoIt's worth noting that Steve Jobs was one of the few lucky ones to work doing something that they love. Working hard in this context still qualifies as hard work, but believing that it's all what entrepreneurship is about is a rather naive and delusional view of things.
- saturdaysaint 15y agoHa, he must have forgotten offering to sell Apple to Commodore back in the Apple I days for a few hundred thousand dollars. Not to say that we should punish people whose views change, but it does seem that a lot of his success in Apple's early days was based on quickly and smartly capitalizing on small projects (eg quickly bringing Woz's engineering feats to market), not necessarily building the enduring platform that became his mission. From the Isaacson bio, he strikes me as a gambler/experimenter whose first company (thanks to much skill, foresight and luck) just so happened to make sense as a long term concern.
- alecbenzer 15y agoI think the guts of what he's saying is just "I hate when people call themselves 'entrepreneurs', when really they just want to get rich quick." edit: quotes like this make me feel like I better understand how Jobs really might have thought (as opposed to how some of his fanboys think, which is what I kind of assume he would think like). Another quote I like is this one: > We’re born, we live for a brief instant, and we die. It’s been happening for a long time. Technology is not changing it much – if at all.
- Hyena 15y agoHe's making a subtle distinction because he objects to the word "entrepreneur" in this context. I see this as a valid objection; perhaps we should consider retiring "serial entrepreneur" for someone who does this frequently. What they're actually doing is building a business that builds businesses. A term for meta-firms might be good.
- brudgers 15y agoIf you go to YC, you already have started selling your company. Not that there's anything wrong with that. But there is no reason to kid one's self.
- kvnn 15y agoI think we've gotten to the point where we are submitting, upvoting and discussing content solely because it has to do with Steve Jobs. This (out of context) quote benefits me in absolutely no way. It might, if there was elaboration or example. Anyway, in my opinion this is a low quality submission and I'm irked by it.
- lightyrs 15y agoAmen.
- lightyrs 15y agoI've been working out of the TechStars offices for the last few months and most of these guys don't care what their product is as long as they can sell it to investors. In Job's world, the customer is the consumer. In the startup world, the customer is the Angel/VC.
- CamperBob 15y ago"Don't bother. Whatever you're working on, we've already patented it."
- rokhayakebe 15y agoCan you elaborate on this, please? Do you mean the minute you publish your work it is already patented?
- idspispopd 15y agoIt is an interesting situation, there seems to be the one-brand, one-tech company. Just ripe for sale, when there is no reason(other than funding) that a founder couldn't start a small tech company or group, and grow various new technologies under the same umbrella, turning each into a product, and thus money stream.
- fashionfshi 15y agoeverybody, the good shoping place, the new season approaching, click in. Welcome to ==== http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com == Air Jordan (1-24) shoes $35 UGG BOOT $50 Nike shox (R4, NZ, OZ, TL1, TL2, TL3) $35 Handbags ( Coach Lv fendi D&G) $35 T-shirts (polo, ed hardy, lacoste) $16 Jean (True Religion, ed hardy, coogi)$34 Sunglasses ( Oakey, coach, Gucci, Armaini)$15 New era cap $16 Bikini (Ed hardy, polo) $18 FREE SHIPPING http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ===（ http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ） ===（ http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ）=== ==（ http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ）=== ===（ http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ）=== ===（ http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ）=== ===（ http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ）=== ===（ http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ）=== ===（ http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ）=== ===（ http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ）=== ===（ http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ）===
- zmonkeyz 15y agoIf your product consists of various products that you build and sell why wouldn't you be an entrepreneur?
- ChrisNorstrom 15y agoJust because Steve Jobs says it doesn't mean it's true. He's human just like everyone else. The thing is, NOT every project, not every product, not every service can be grown into a full blown company. It just doesn't work that way. Go to any store and look at all the bottles of shampoo you can choose from, all those brands belong mainly to 1 or 2 companies, Unilever and Johnson. Same with food products. If every little shirt, and every brand of crackers where its own company with it's own marking, and distribution, and it's own packaging plant, it's own lawyers, it's own administration offices, it's own headquarters... We'd be paying triple for everything. (although we would have a lot more jobs... correction, the Chinese would have a lot more jobs...) Some products just can't be monetized to support themselves so they MUST be acquired by a company that can integrate them into its own profitable services (or product line) and compete better with other competitors doing the same. If nobody flipped it would screw over entrepreneurs by forcing them to commit themselves to one industry, one company, one product line their whole lives instead of being able to create companies, sell them, repeat. Thereby going in and out of numerous industries and markets instead of just one. Can you really see every product becoming its own corporation? On the other hand, companies like Google and facebook (who's only difference from competitors were features) grew into their own massive companies. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Starting a company, growing it, and optimizing it are three different things. Very rarely are there people who are good at all three. Jobs is one of them, Zuckerberg another, but they're lottery stories. Their advice may not work for the majority of people. - My 2 cents.