3 ms·
Indeed this is overly editorialised and the author very much assumes the reader is of the same opinion of them from the outset. The author seems to believe that
by nbevans 4y ago
Indeed this is overly editorialised and the author very much assumes the reader is of the same opinion of them from the outset. The author seems to believe that web browsers will just ignore UK legislation and not bother to implement the necessary changes.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- tjbiddle 4y ago
- Arkanum 4y ago*she Although i can't find any clear statement of pronouns [1] https://webdevlaw.uk/about/ https://webdevlaw.uk/about/ [2] https://twitter.com/WebDevLaw https://twitter.com/WebDevLaw
- nbevans 4y agoThank you!
- iostream24 4y agoIt has not been editorialized at all, let alone overly editorialized. The author outlines the consequences of a very Ill-thought-out law that will harm the worldwide web, not protect users, and damage what is left of the UKs standing in the world. Telling the truth is never “overly” doing anything. Sometimes, you must call a spade “a spade” Do you have some information to contribute to the discussion or are you suggesting that the author should lie instead?
- nbevans 4y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html