I haven’t followed this for a while, but I remember the main argument for extradition was that he induced the release of classified information. A transcript us

I haven’t followed this for a while, but I remember the main argument for extradition was that he induced the release of classified information. A transcript used as proof that I read in the grand jury testimony was a joke a d certainly showed no evidence of inducing the documents’ release. Hence I still haven’t seen any evidence that a crime occurred (even according to US law). The publication of classified documents certainly isn’t a crime. Even when making biased choices about what to publish or not redacting information. Also I don’t see why you put so much importance on his testimony being under oath. Clapper directly lied to congress under oath and never saw any consequences. It’s an interesting double standard we have.