3 ms·

Look, superficially I could list out ICO, IITA, AAPPI, and a host of other privacy and cookie-related laws and legal bodies. Anyone with Google can do that and

Look, superficially I could list out ICO, IITA, AAPPI, and a host of other privacy and cookie-related laws and legal bodies. Anyone with Google can do that and it’s not really an indicator of expertise because listing things doesn’t mean I understand their content or their consequences. Also recall, the jurisdiction you’re demanding was mentioned in my very first response to you: Europe. What exactly is it that you’re trying to argue at this point?

dmitriid 4y ago
> Look, superficially I could list out ICO, IITA, AAPPI, and a host of other privacy and cookie-related laws and legal bodies. Anyone with Google can do that Yes, you could. No, you didn't. > Also recall, the jurisdiction you’re demanding was mentioned in my very first response to you: Europe. This is what you said: " I guard against presumption: so I don’t make references to forms of European legislation" So no, you didn't make references to Europe, and you continued to vaguely describe some vague unknown jurisdictions. > What exactly is it that you’re trying to argue at this point? That's a question to you, really. I've said my piece here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31774633 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31774633 You could, of course, respond by pointing out legal frameworks or laws where the discussed cookie banner is actually required. And yet, here we are, in a pointless thread where you've pointed out none.