3 ms·
Haskell has an elegance, and can be written as simply as C. Usually fast enough, and can be optimized as well. The downside is that you will be sucked into a ra
by mcbuilder 4y ago
Haskell has an elegance, and can be written as simply as C. Usually fast enough, and can be optimized as well. The downside is that you will be sucked into a rabbit hole of academic type theory and wonder how best to express your system as a Free Monad instead of bashing it out like any sane C programmer. Just kidding, someone already figured out those hard parts for you, you just forgot to browse for it on Hackage.
- bigDinosaur 4y agoIt's a fair criticism of Haskell that you can fairly easily blow up your time/space complexity without realising it though. I think in many ways it's better but Haskell specifically demands a lot even for a functional language.