What's "excessively naive" is to act like you're not suggesting people work for free, when indeed you are. You're simply performing a sleight of hand: instead

What's "excessively naive" is to act like you're not suggesting people work for free, when indeed you are. You're simply performing a sleight of hand: instead of framing it as the doctor working for free, you shift the free labor onto mostly people making a lesser income. You sir/mam, are both deceptive and disingenuous. >The actual argument you wanted to make And how incredibly good faith of you to bring up taxation of roads, school, and police and then have the gall to act like it's a waste to discuss the very subject YOU YOURSELF INTRODUCED. My brother, I did not mention anything about the taxation of roads/police/schools until you brought it up, it's beginning to look like that's the real argument YOU wanted to introduce.