4 ms·
You can rationalize it that way, I get it. However, last I checked Mozilla has a lawyer as their CEO. Why do you think they haven't tested this idea in court if
by joecool1029 4y ago
You can rationalize it that way, I get it. However, last I checked Mozilla has a lawyer as their CEO. Why do you think they haven't tested this idea in court if the message is so good?
- price 4y agoThe blog post you are writing comments about is literally about working to get the law changed. Courts apply the existing law. The existing law puts very few constraints on big companies using their power. That is exactly why Mozilla is urging Congress to change the law.
- stale2002 4y agoDid you read the blog post at all? It answers this question. The answer is that they are trying to change the law.
- joecool1029 4y ago>Did you read the blog post at all? Did you read the bill at all? That's more important than the Google-funded PR piece. This bill they are promoting contains nationalistic or sinophobic text. I could see a targeted party like Apple moving their argument from 'It would negatively impact user experience' to 'China could hack our users if we allow other browser engines' and it'd be totally cool under this bill. It's a shit bill with a very narrow scope that's easily evaded.