4 ms·
Wayland is at best a work in progress. And if you consider that they made Wayland default on GNOME to force adoption and users usually go to Internet seeking f
by akagusu 4y ago
Wayland is at best a work in progress.
And if you consider that they made Wayland default on GNOME to force adoption and users usually go to Internet seeking for advice on how to switch back to X11 on GNOME, we will probably wait a long time for Wayland happen.
- christophilus 4y agoI’ve been using it happily for over a year with no real issues. But I do share your concern. I like the variety and choice of WMs on Linux and the Gnome / Wayland crowd do seem to add friction to the other contenders.
- akagusu 4y ago> I like the variety and choice of WMs on Linux and the Gnome / Wayland crowd do seem to add friction to the other contenders. This is a big problem because this friction they add on purpose hurts users of other wm/desktops that don't get their preferred wm/de working correctly. And it also hurts other open-source developers because it seems the only ones doing something right are the Gnome devs, when in fact the others devs are having problems only because Gnome devs.
- prmoustache 4y agoThe Gnome dev do not force anyone on anything, especially regarding parts of the linux desktop they don't develop themselves. This is just conspiracy theory.
- prmoustache 4y agoThe silent majority is just using wayland without complaining because it just works.
- rawoke083600 4y ago>The silent majority is just using wayland without complaining because it just works. Huh ! That is not a fair argument. The silent majority is by definition impossible (or very hard to find) and confirm if its true. Since you know... they silent and all !