4 ms·
Apple allows other browsers. They don't allow other browser engines. And I actually don't see how cementing the Chrome engine's dominance on iOS as well as oth
by threeseed 4y ago
Apple allows other browsers. They don't allow other browser engines.
And I actually don't see how cementing the Chrome engine's dominance on iOS as well as other platforms is good for the web. Because inevitably that is what will happen as just like in the IE days, websites will only work on that browser as it offers the most proprietary features. And why would you develop for multiple browsers when Chrome is available on all platforms and has such dominant market share.
People really need to be more careful with this because it could make the web less private, less secure, less driven by a spec and more beholden to Google's interests at the time.
- abirch 4y agoI thought you could change your search engine. I just did it on my iPad: Setting > Safari > Search Engine https://9to5mac.com/2021/02/09/duckduckgo/ https://9to5mac.com/2021/02/09/duckduckgo/
- coder543 4y agoThe comment you replied to did not mention search engines at all. Yes, you can change your default search engine.
- abirch 4y agoYou're right. I misread browser engine as search engine.
- richardsocher 4y agoThat won't work for any up and coming search engine. They're not allowing you.com or any other smaller search engine that can't afford it.
- tehlike 4y agoSafari on mobile has lagged behind standards for a long time, because doing so wouldn't strengthen their app business. E.g. webrtc. Safari still lags behind many things. When you call people to be careful, you are missing the conflict apple has internally. Between the two, i choose chrome any day of the week because that's what allowed web to progress this fast
- gbear605 4y agoThe web has been progressing too fast, and most of the things that Safari has held back on are features that developers want but users don’t, like push notifications.
- tehlike 4y agoPush notifications exists in app and it's easy to categorically disable it. I am absolutely happy that i have a few pwas installed on my phone that lets me do stuff on phone and desktop together. The fact that i had to/have to install an app (zoom, etc) to accept a conference call is sad.
- tylerhou 4y agoI'd rather enable push notifications on a website than have to install a whole new app if I want them.
- kevingadd 4y agoIf push notifications are so bad why does every mobile app spam me with them? All of these things "users don't want" are right there for use in App Store apps. They're only held back from the browser because they want you to give them 30%. In some cases they literally added features to Safari but restricted them for use in advertisements only (WebGL for one example, IIRC) because the features aren't the problem, the problem is developers accessing customers without paying 30%.
- gbear605 4y agoMany push notifications are spam that developers want to send and users don’t actually care about. But more than that, the fact that you actually downloaded an app is much higher proof that you want to get notifications than just going to a site and clicking yes on a dialog. Dialogs basically mean nothing because users will just click yes without thinking about it.
- tehlike 4y ago
- ThatPlayer 4y agoIf you believe the only reason people are using and developing for Safari is because of Apple's monopoly, then that's a real cost or harm to users and developers isn't it? Compared to a theoretical or possible cost of a Chrome monopoly that may not happen. And if it does, then that's what antitrust is for. I don't want to give Apple a monopoly to protect me from a different monopoly. I want to give power to antitrust to protect me from all monopolies, include Apple's and Google's.