I would firmly disagree with you. I think you are falling for an argument to moderation. You can look at most fringe theories in history and find nominal scient

I would firmly disagree with you. I think you are falling for an argument to moderation. You can look at most fringe theories in history and find nominal scientists that support it. Scientists are people, too, and are subject to all sorts of human mental weaknesses. This is a crank theory because it starts with a conclusion and has been trying to fit the evidence to it, and for a long time. Read this linked paper - really scrutinize the data, the charts, and the conclusions. There are simpler explanations that fit the data better, and the impact data is really dubious. I am not reacting to the point that some people wish there was a technically advanced pre-Clovis culture that was submerged (aka, Atlantis without admitting it is Atlantis). I am looking at the ice core data in this paper, the extinction records, and the time scales involved. They do not add up.