5 ms·

> You have a design preference that more than one fullscreen video should not be permitted. I think this is where you and I are talking past each other. I'm no

> You have a design preference that more than one fullscreen video should not be permitted. I think this is where you and I are talking past each other. I'm not saying that multiple videos shouldn't be allowed. That's not the problem here. The problem is that Safari has a mechanism to ensure that the user wants a video to play. That mechanism looks for some UI action on the user's part before it will allow a site to launch the video player. With this new multiple-video feature, that mechanism is now broken. It'll say, "Hey you want to play this video? Yeah, ok, I will allow it, and any other video the site wants to spam you with now." That italicized part is the bug. It shouldn't assume the UI action applies to an arbitrary number of separate videos. The video player is fine. That's the design choice. The Safari code not accounting for that is the bug.

Maursault 4y ago
You're still talking about interface design and not an error in the actual code. You're talking about how the user is interacting with the software, and/or how a website developer writes up his crappy site. The software itself isn't broken. But the interaction between user and client and server is getting under your skin and you're insisting it is a bug... when it simply is not a bug. "Every time a try to click this link, my browser crashes!" <--- that sounds like a bug. "I'm able to create a webpage that exploits a user interaction to create weird behavior" <---- not a bug! if a problem exists it is within the realm of User Interface Design and not software design or anything within the code itself. The design choices may cause a need to rework the code, but that doesn't make a bug magically appear in the code.
- function_seven 4y ago
  I’m just going to quote myself, upthread: > Okay, so it may not be a software bug at all, but I'm gonna move these goalposts and insist this is a product design bug, or something.

Maursault 4y ago

You're still talking about interface design and not an error in the actual code. You're talking about how the user is interacting with the software, and/or how a website developer writes up his crappy site. The software itself isn't broken. But the interaction between user and client and server is getting under your skin and you're insisting it is a bug... when it simply is not a bug. "Every time a try to click this link, my browser crashes!" <--- that sounds like a bug. "I'm able to create a webpage that exploits a user interaction to create weird behavior" <---- not a bug! if a problem exists it is within the realm of User Interface Design and not software design or anything within the code itself. The design choices may cause a need to rework the code, but that doesn't make a bug magically appear in the code.

function_seven 4y ago
I’m just going to quote myself, upthread: > Okay, so it may not be a software bug at all, but I'm gonna move these goalposts and insist this is a product design bug, or something.