The main problem with Wayland is not technical but political. It follows the same forced adoption tactics than systemd. People don't use it because it lacks m

The main problem with Wayland is not technical but political. It follows the same forced adoption tactics than systemd. People don't use it because it lacks many features compared to X and other implemented features do not work as good as on X. So what do they do? They make Wayland, which is incomplete and beta quality, the default graphic engine of GNOME, which is the default desktop environment of 90% of Linux distributions. And when people complain about this, the only thing they say is X is dead, Wayland is the future.