4 ms·
>So not "recent" but also not "ancient. Is the 11th century too recent to qualify as "ancient"? We're going back ~950 years here...
by M2Ys4U 4y ago
>So not "recent" but also not "ancient.
Is the 11th century too recent to qualify as "ancient"? We're going back ~950 years here...
- mc32 4y agoMedieval, I would say. "Ancient" to me ends more or less with the fall of Rome (Not Constantinople).