> The directors have a legal responsibility to the company and to boost the share price, not for the betterment of humanity. I think this is true for large org

> The directors have a legal responsibility to the company and to boost the share price, not for the betterment of humanity. I think this is true for large organisations, the larger they are the more their behaviour seems to become dictated by the rules of the environment it operates within; whereas the smaller the organisation the more principled they can be as individuals have the power and will to override those rules. Also with something as large as Microsoft there are so many departments that one can be actively working against the interests of another, i.e MS can and probably does simultaneously do good and bad faith activities for open-source - and yet we commonly anthropomorphise them as if they have the integrity and consistency of an individual... A human flaw i guess.