3 ms·
I don't think you have a right to claim some piece of land for eternity, at the expense of future people who want to use that space to live in (or for their inf
by rlpb 4y ago
I don't think you have a right to claim some piece of land for eternity, at the expense of future people who want to use that space to live in (or for their infrastructure).
So if your grave can't just remain there, what's the alternative? Do you just want it destroyed without inspection?
- treis 4y agoMoved and interred in a more convenient location?
- rlpb 4y agoThe body would still be claiming some piece of land for eternity; just somewhere else. This would still break my "no claim on land for eternity" requirement.
- treis 4y agoPerhaps this is semantics, but you're not placing a claim on a piece of land for eternity. You're placing a claim on any piece of land. And it's not for eternity. It's for so long as the land is not otherwise used or until geologic forces make it irrelevant.
- AlotOfReading 4y agoPeople forget where burial grounds are all the time and the first reminder is when a backhoe goes through a grave. Best case, they call an archaeologist to figure out if there are any more and to relocate what's left.