> Labelling the “science” as “dubious” is basically slighting the people attempting to track these slights at something other than a personal level. First, no

> Labelling the “science” as “dubious” is basically slighting the people attempting to track these slights at something other than a personal level. First, no claiming you doubt is not a slight. Claiming you don't believe it at all because there is no evidence is not either. Second, this piece isn't merely labeling. It explains why microaggressions are not to be believed. > A better critique would look at ways to improve data collection, We don't all agree with your "better" and it's certainly not a requirement. Is this some kind of "criticism slight?" ;-)