4 ms·
A couple of comments here talking about how this is piracy, none discussing the fact that paywalls are a completely broken business model in an era where sharin
by AussieWog93 4y ago
A couple of comments here talking about how this is piracy, none discussing the fact that paywalls are a completely broken business model in an era where sharing information with your friends/online communities is so important.
Back in the day, with physical paper, if you wanted to discuss an article with someone you'd simply hand them the paper and point. Now, people simply don't share paywalled articles, or if they do someone will comment an archived link immediately.
As Gabe Newell once said, "piracy is almost always a service problem". If the media companies started delivering the product in a way that people actually want the problem of piracy would disappear overnight.
Just shooting the shit, but $x a month to read the paper, with a button to generate un-paywalled links to share with friends and family, and $y a month for a "thought leader" version that lets you generate un-paywalled links with unlimited circulation would let people consume and share news the way they actually want to while still being monetisable.
Trying to charge everyone who looks at your article in an era where success is defined by virality is just dumb.
- pmontra 4y agoMaybe this is what people want but maybe it isn't. I'm not paying a subscription because I find the news I want to read for free anyway. There are a zillion sites reporting exactly the same things.
- pxc 4y agoI think that kind of thing works better for magazines or journals, where coverage arrives more slowly but the analyses and writing are less redundant between publications (and sometimes even meaningfully unique).
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]