> (Technically I guess you could do without NAT if you gave every host on your LAN two addresses: a private address and a publicly-routable one. But that might

> (Technically I guess you could do without NAT if you gave every host on your LAN two addresses: a private address and a publicly-routable one. But that might be more cumbersome.) For any IPv6 setup, you already have multiple addresses per host. You start with your mandatory link-local unicast address from the `fe80::/10` range and then you add a global address after getting a prefix from your router. I don't see how adding a third address, particularly a static one, would be cumbersome.