4 ms·

I didn't think it was widely used, I'm sure it's very very rarely used. I was saying it was relevant because it represents the "future" of cryptography. I woul

I didn't think it was widely used, I'm sure it's very very rarely used. I was saying it was relevant because it represents the "future" of cryptography. I would think that any kind of key exchange algorithm that relies on a constant time algorithm is vulnerable to this. I could be wrong.

avianes 4y ago
Not a cryptography specialist, but I doubt that all crypto algorithms have the same property of causing 0s (or 1s) to massively appear for some inputs in a way that could lead to a key leakage with this attack. I believe that SIKE is an extrem case which allows to perform this attack with more ease. However I suspect that by refining the attack then it could be extended to other algorithms less sensitive to power side-channel.