3 ms·
This "nothing" is valueable information nonetheless. Science is just as much (often more) about ruling out hypotheses as it is about confirming them. Sometimes
by usrbinbash 4y ago
This "nothing" is valueable information nonetheless.
Science is just as much (often more) about ruling out hypotheses as it is about confirming them. Sometimes that means ruling out all existing hypotheses, meaning new ones have to be formulated to be tested in turn.
- fhars 4y agoThe problem here is that the most favoured hypothesis currently is "there is nothing there that can be discovered with any accelerator that can be built using less than 80% of the world's GDP over the next 50 years." And all the valuable "nothing" we currently find just supports the hypothesis and that there is no point in formulating additional hypotheses.
- bpye 4y agoI'm curious, what are the experiments we could run if we had for example 80% of the world's GDP?
- adamsmith143 4y agoLots of Grand Unified Theory candidates become interesting at extremely high energy levels and many of them assume the various fundamental forces will merge. You can test these theories at sufficiently high energy levels.