3 ms·
Apparently nobody here has actually read or even skimmed the article. The author obviously knows that Britain has been connected by land to the continent severa
by Sharlin 4y ago
Apparently nobody here has actually read or even skimmed the article. The author obviously knows that Britain has been connected by land to the continent several times in the past million years.
- emsixteen 4y agoBit redundant reading the article that's asking a question that's got a clear answer, really. Just because it's posted here doesn't make it worth reading.
- Sharlin 4y agoThe headline asks a rhetorical question and the article argues that the answer is more complicated than "duh, they walked there". That's the whole point.
- tremon 4y agoDoes the article even have a salient point worth discussing in relation to its clickbait title? I think I can sum up the entire article with just the sentence "a tangle of footprints near Hazebruh (because this is England) has been dated 850,000–950,000 years ago". It certainly doesn't answer the question in a more succinct way than the OP did.