3 ms·
Yep, by itself the data in the article is kind of useless unless we can get that normalised to crashes per km driven, and to also include stats on other manufac
by sundvor 4y ago
Yep, by itself the data in the article is kind of useless unless we can get that normalised to crashes per km driven, and to also include stats on other manufacturers' cars' use of autonomous systems at the time of crashes.
The author alluded to it by saying Tesla collects more data, however it doesn't state that no other manufacturer collects what we want to know about (E.g. dynamic cruise control, active lane keep assist wheel nudges, AEB activation, etc).
So, actual data please, then let's compare apples to apples rather than this sensationalist clickbait. (I would really like to see crashes per km for both AP on, AP off, and FSD beta enabled in the case of Tesla.)
- deschutes 4y agoI agree. I also want to note that Tesla has treated this subject like an opportunity to market and really done nothing to deserve the benefit of the doubt.
- rightbyte 4y ago> normalised to crashes per km driven Preferably normalised by type of road too. I.e. if one system only drives on highways it might not compare to one that drives on more dangerous roads.
- sundvor 4y agoGood point.