2 ms·
In that vein, I think the guidelines (http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) are too wishy-washy: "On-Topic: An
by jsdalton 15y ago
In that vein, I think the guidelines (http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) are too wishy-washy:
"On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic."
The guidelines grant too much leeway here and make it difficult to educate new members about what's appropriate. Off topic should just read: "NO politics, sports, crime or general news stories." Full stop, no excuses.
Likewise, the on topic section provides too much cover for people to submit just about anything (hard to get more broad than "anything that satisfies one's intellectual curiosity."). I'd rather see tight, specific rules and let the community decide when it's appropriate to bend them.
- snth 15y agoOn the topic of guidelines, the purpose of the up- and down-vote arrows is not well-defined. Are we supposed to use them as "like" and "dislike", "agree" and "disagree", or "adds-to-discussion" and "doesn't-add-to-discussion"? Even "flag"- is that for spam, for rude posts, or for offtopic posts? I've seen these things discussed, and pg has given his opinion on some of them in comment threads, but we should decide and put the answer in the site guidelines.
- statictype 15y agoYes please. The 'anything hackers would find interesting' line is a loophole to introduce politics. I think emphasis should be placed on the 'If it appears in the evening news it probably doesn't belong here' line.