My point was that hate speech is currently protected, and yet none of the hyperbole you mentioned actually exists in reality. Obviously you knew that those thi

My point was that hate speech is currently protected, and yet none of the hyperbole you mentioned actually exists in reality. Obviously you knew that those things don't happen. So were you perhaps under the mistaken impression that hate speech is not currently protected and were suggesting what you believe may happen if it were allowed? If that is not the case, then what point were you making with the use of hyperbole that addresses my original assertion that banning hate speech allows hateful people to hide? > it was an example of an instance of a hyperbolic example of giving them a platform. At no point did I ever suggest anything about "giving them a platform" so I'm not sure who you're arguing with, but it isn't me.