2 ms·
Correct, employer provided housing not taxed in certain cases, so you get some massive tax savings this way. Be interesting to see what argument amazon might ma
by onphonenow 4y ago
Correct, employer provided housing not taxed in certain cases, so you get some massive tax savings this way. Be interesting to see what argument amazon might make. Needs to be:
* The housing is provided on the property owned by the business or employer.
* The housing is provided for the convenience of the employer.
* The employee must accept housing as a condition of employment.
Intended more for folks like on-call firefighters living in a firehouse or a park ranger who is required to live in a cabin in a park or nanny's staying with their family. I could see some situations amazon might have an argument to make - they could probably do micro-units or shared housing / dorm style housing for workers and save massively on labor costs especially in high cost urban areas where folks would otherwise never be able to afford a place.