3 ms·

Again hyperbole with comments like “10x more skilled”. If you had a valid point to make, you wouldn’t need to fill your post with exaggeration. I don’t even thi

Again hyperbole with comments like “10x more skilled”. If you had a valid point to make, you wouldn’t need to fill your post with exaggeration. I don’t even think you realize you’re doing it. We both know the Alana has many physical disadvantages compared to a male fighter. I don’t know why you feel the need to ignore that fact.

wcarron 4y ago
> Again hyperbole with comments like “10x more skilled”. That's not hyperbole. That's plainly evident just from watching the fight. Her striking was more precise, her timing was better, her form was better, her head movement was better, footwork and spacing, too. Her tactics were very appropriate for the challenge whilst Alana showed no fight intelligence. Add all that up and I would absolutely say she is exponentially more skilled. 1 exponent, but still, exponential. Alana literally kept ducking into the left hand strikes and throwing blind haymakers. Alana's takedown technique was unfathomably bad. She won because her biological advantages outweighed her lack of skill. Plain and simple.
- MattRix 4y ago
  Would you say the most skilled person always wins every MMA fight? Would you say there has never been a fight between two fighters where one was more technical skilled or agile and the other was more physical or strong?