3 ms·
Billionaires provide value as alternate sources of power to the state. Distributed sources of philanthropy that can target areas neglected by government are one
by krrrh 4y ago
Billionaires provide value as alternate sources of power to the state. Distributed sources of philanthropy that can target areas neglected by government are one thing (Carnegie’s libraries, Bill Gates work on tropical diseases, Frick’s art collection which he donated to the American people, alternate media and educational projects (Ford foundation’s continued funding of NPR, Soros’ Open Society Foundation, Koch funding of the Reason foundation and CATO etc, putting hyperbolic conspiracy theories aside these all enrich the political conversation and increase the opportunities for policy experimentation)). Secondly, billionaires have a good claim on being experienced and skilled deployers of capital. A wealth tax would have limited the capacity for private investment in EV, space flight, the acceleration of cloud computing.
There are two common ripostes to this. One is that these are wasteful vanity projects, which just proves the point that there is value to this sort of decentralized system of capital allocation where some small percentage of total available capital is in the hands of quixotic individuals who can pursue aims that a majority of the population doesn’t (yet) see the value of. The second objection is that these things should all be handled by the state. It’s fine for people to want space exploration to be entirely handled by NASA for instance, but the record is pretty clear that US (and by extension humanity’s) pace of space exploration has been absolutely transformed by the ability for private actors with substantial resources to make moves outside of an existing bureaucracy.
The US government spends upwards of $4T dollars a year, and the media class has a much larger influence on politics than and group of billionaires could buy. Because most billionaires are entrepreneurs they also typically look at ways they can deploy capital that are underserved and where the state would be an inappropriate actor in terms of required risk and innovation. A group of talented weirdos that have the resources to move the needle on neglected projects is a feature not a bug.
- Johnny555 4y agoA wealth tax wouldn't prevent the Gates Foundation from existing, it would encourage it -- instead of keeping personal wealth that's going to be taxed, the would-be billionaire can set up a charitable foundation like the Gates Foundation to spend the money. Since the charity is run by a board and bound to abide by its charter, it's not the same thing as the person controlling the wealth himself. The Gates Foundation is not going to buy Bill Gates a private island with a $100M super yacht to get there.
- thrwy_meta 4y ago>>>Since the charity is run by a board and bound to abide by its charter, it's not the same thing as the person controlling the wealth himself I would expect this to be a "distinction without a difference" if the billionaire is careful/competent about how he staffs the board and how he writes the charter.
- namaria 4y ago>Billionaires provide value as alternate sources of power to the state. You haven't yet figured out that all institutions and corporations are merely instruments of the monied classes?
- yellowapple 4y ago> Billionaires provide value as alternate sources of power to the state. Billionaires are the state. They would not exist if the state didn't specifically provide them with the mechanisms to amass such wealth at the expense of the rest of us.
- otikik 4y ago> Billionaires provide value as alternate sources of power to the state Lobbying is a thing. In the US those people can pretty much legally buy any politician they want.