> It doesn't though. Taxing the rich, limiting the existence of billionaires is not going to do anything for equalizing opportunities. > If you think so, then

> It doesn't though. Taxing the rich, limiting the existence of billionaires is not going to do anything for equalizing opportunities. > If you think so, then please tell me the name of one efficiently-run government organization? How are these two passages connected? If there's one efficiently-run government organization (there are, even in the US—benefits programs tend to be quite efficient, contrary to "common knowledge") then that proves... what? That taxing the rich would equalize opportunities? The two things have practically nothing to do with one another.