4 ms·
Any noise strong enough to have a good chance of hiding the signal would completely defeat the benefit of having dynamic frequency scaling in the first place, I
by cylon13 4y ago
Any noise strong enough to have a good chance of hiding the signal would completely defeat the benefit of having dynamic frequency scaling in the first place, I think.
- sneak 4y agoExcept that the processor can be doing other work during artificially induced noise delays, something not possible with delays introduced by lower mean frequency.
- bobbylarrybobby 4y agoWhat if you discretized the allowed frequencies and linked the rate at which the cpu could switch?
- staticassertion 4y agoAn additional millisecond to your public key exchange is probably not going to matter - key exchange is pretty infrequent anyway.