> NT 4 was rubbish for laptops. But it was a state-of-the-art OS for desktops in 1996. That matches my recollection. I was working in a shop that used NT 4 on

> NT 4 was rubbish for laptops. But it was a state-of-the-art OS for desktops in 1996. That matches my recollection. I was working in a shop that used NT 4 on 15000+ desktops. (I do recall SP3 or SP4 causing a ton of drama on those.) We were never able to get it to run acceptably on a laptop. I never used OS/2 2.0 in anger. I did run Warp 4 on a few systems and recall preferring it over NT 4. It was also only suitable for desktops, though.