3 ms·
Sample size of 98. No controls or comparisons. And they specifically were searching for chemicals with anomalous representation. Take it with a grain of salt b
by legitster 4y ago
Sample size of 98. No controls or comparisons. And they specifically were searching for chemicals with anomalous representation.
Take it with a grain of salt big enough to club someone with.
- diydsp 4y agoIt's not an experiment, it's a study. > The team then compared the results with acceptable levels of exposure derived from the scientific literature.
- tinco 4y agoSample size of 98 is pretty large for this kind of study. What sort of sample size would you suggest, and why?
- legitster 4y ago> The researchers acknowledged some limitations to their research. > For example, the data used dated from 2009 to 2010, and exposure to BPA may have decreased since, while exposure to other chemicals may have increased. > Another uncertainty is whether women of reproductive age have the same levels of chemical exposure as the men in the study. Even the researchers suggested a wider time frame and a larger comparison group.
- ClumsyPilot 4y agoEvery research ever conducted suggests a larger study. Is there any quarterly report that doesnt suggest doing something to invrease profits
- ipnon 4y agoIt's good to be sceptical but this is a pandemic of sexual dysfunction that needs a working theory as soon as possible, and these results are in line with our current understanding of pollution endocrinology.