2 ms·
And then we stick them on antidepressants. > Although only 8.6% of American males are on antidepressants at any given time, they seem much better represented a
by cronix 4y ago
And then we stick them on antidepressants.
> Although only 8.6% of American males are on antidepressants at any given time, they seem much better represented as a percentage of mass shooters. Here are 39 mass shooters who were either on antidepressants at the time of their rampage, had abruptly quit taking their medication when they went on their spree, or had been prescribed antidepressants at some point in the past.
https://thoughtcatalog.com/jeremy-london/2019/09/37-mass-shooters-who-were-on-antidepressants/ https://thoughtcatalog.com/jeremy-london/2019/09/37-mass-sho...
Michael Moore came to the same conclusion when researching for his movie, Bowling for Columbine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04UqzYOdGNs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04UqzYOdGNs
These drugs can have serious side effects in x/1,000,000 people. What happens when you give them to tens of millions? You'll start to see those edge cases. Why didn't we have many of these mass shootings prior to 1990? When did we start mass dosing our kids? I think we have a lot more research to do, if anyone is actually willing, but you'd be going up against the big guys.