3 ms·
Right, the consent window should have been a browser thing so that it is always the same and so that it follows the laws and cant involve dark patterns. By rea
by 6510 4y ago
Right, the consent window should have been a browser thing so that it is always the same and so that it follows the laws and cant involve dark patterns.
By reading this message you agree with it.
- fleddr 4y agoThe answer is similar to the DNT (do not track) debacle. When you give users a clear, informed, singular choice that would be sticky across their entire web/app experience, the choice in itself essentially becomes obsolete. Since pretty much nobody opts-in. You saw the effect with Apple's new "do you want to be tracked" permission, which has a disastrous impact on Facebook. Consider that this is still a per-app permission, imagine the impact when its a single permission across all apps. As users we may say "good" and "this is what we want", but I don't think we can truly oversee what impact that would have.
- 6510 4y agoFacebook neither needs or deserves my pity. If person A wants to do something to B that we can assume B does not approve of then A can ask if its okay. If A would never approve it doesn't magically become okay to do it. The thing could only happen if A has authority over B. As FB is not ur mum, not the government and not your employer they should ask the question or shut up.