> Without independence, same as now. Given that even including north sea revenue Scotland is still subsidised by London Forgive me if I've misinterpreted, but

> Without independence, same as now. Given that even including north sea revenue Scotland is still subsidised by London Forgive me if I've misinterpreted, but you seem to think that's an argument for staying in the UK but I see it as an argument for getting out. It's a crutch, and Scotland needs to figure out how to stand on it's own power. Why should rUK subsidise indefinitely? What if suddenly it decides to stop? And why shoudn't it?