3 ms·
SSO, probably not - embedding, possibly. If you're just worried about logging in through sso.coolcorp.com to third-party.corp using any of the normal methods (
by svieira 4y ago
SSO, probably not - embedding, possibly.
If you're just worried about logging in through sso.coolcorp.com to third-party.corp using any of the normal methods (OAuth, SAML, Kerberos, etc.) then you're probably fine.
If you're worried about composing a page made up of lots of custom embedded components and those components _don't_ use SSO (or if they do, but they authenticate invisibly using an iframe instead of authenticating entirely server-side) then you may have some things to switch up.
- throwaway0x7E6 4y agowith mozilla's 2% browser market share, as a developer you don't need to worry at all
- robin_reala 4y agoGiven the number of Firefox users that block Google Analytics, I wouldn’t be convinced about a 2% figure.
- ale42 4y agoIt also depends who the users are... given that Firefox tends to be used by many technically-inclined users, sysadmins, etc. (at least according to what I observe around me), it might be users you might want to consider, depending on what you're offering...
- Sohcahtoa82 4y agoYou can block Google Analytics all you want. Unless you're spoofing your User-Agent, servers still know what browser you're using.
- TheCoelacanth 4y agoThe question isn't whether the server logs are there. It's whether anyone looks at them instead of GA for browser information.
- dblohm7 4y agoBut GA, statcounter et al don’t use server logs. They use JavaScript.
- calvinmorrison 4y ago> You may have some things to switch up. Or rather a large logo that says "Please use a supported browser."