4 ms·
What struck me about this announcement was that the CEO states a couple of times that he is accountable for the decision, but doesn't say what form that account
by andyjohnson0 4y ago
What struck me about this announcement was that the CEO states a couple of times that he is accountable for the decision, but doesn't say what form that accountability takes. I try not to be cynical, but I suspect in this case that there will be no actual, real accountability.
- jakebasile 4y agoIt's his fault and the buck stops with him, but guess who is remaining employed?
- dvt 4y agoI mean, it's his company. Kind of a weird comment to make.
- andyjohnson0 4y ago> I mean, it's his company. Kind of a weird comment to make. Its a public company, so it belongs to the shareholders. Brian Armstrong is one of the founders, and is the largest share owner, but a cursory google suggests that he owns just about 10% of the shares by value.
- q1w2 4y ago...and the shareholders literally determine his salary. Why do you care what these people pay each other?
- hajile 4y agoThat's like saying that US citizens vote for the Federal swamp. 99% of them are totally against the swamp, yet the swamp continues. Voting doesn't matter if there's no real ability to vote for real change.
- q1w2 4y agoIf there is any truth in this world it is that shareholders absolutely call the shots. Anyone with any experience in finance can produce tens of thousands of examples of this - from shareholder lawsuits, to activist investors, to hostile takeovers, to board shakeups... The list goes on and on and on and on...
- caminante 4y agoWhat do you have in mind for "real accountability?" He could've deflected responsibility or hid behind a proxy, which happens all the time. Now, he gets more judgment good/bad directed at him from shareholders, the board, and customers.
- i13e 4y agohttps://www.theblock.co/linked/96078/coinbase-ceo-brian-armstrong-60-million-total-compensation-2020 https://www.theblock.co/linked/96078/coinbase-ceo-brian-arms... Taking a pay cut in addition to the layoffs would be a good start
- lkramer 4y agoBonus and Salary cut would be a good place to start.
- andyjohnson0 4y ago> What do you have in mind for "real accountability?" Reduction in pay and/or bonus. Loss of options. Reduction in his health cover to the same amount being offered to the people being sacked. Temporary or permanent removal from the board (probably not legally possible, but...). Obviously none of those things will happen because, short of gross misconduct, they basically never happen to people in the executive layer - especially founders. > He could've deflected responsibility or hid behind a proxy, which happens all the time. Now, he gets more judgment good/bad directed at him from shareholders, the board, and customers. I think it would have been better for him not to claim personal accountability when everyone knows there is none. It's false and un-empathic. He has a net worth of $2.4 billion: there are no consequences and so no accountability.
- jjulius 4y agoNow, far be it from me to claim that there wasn't bloat in their workforce that generally needed to go, but if money is an issue, I'm pretty sure the CEO could use a house that costs a lot less than $133 million.
- gsibble 4y agoWell, Brian has lost billins in personal wealth. That's certainly something.
- tedivm 4y agoHe just bought a house for $133,000,000. That's enough to give everyone who was laid off slightly a severance of more than $120,000. Somehow I'm expecting accountability to be significantly less than that.
- bogomipz 4y agoI had to look this up after seeing that eye popping number. Apparently 9 figure homes is a thing amongst the billionaire class: https://www.dirt.com/gallery/moguls/finance/brian-armstrong-house-bel-air-los-angeles-1203445464/ https://www.dirt.com/gallery/moguls/finance/brian-armstrong-...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jjulius 4y agoWhile simultaneously, Coinbase says that "managing the burn rate" is a primary reason for layoffs. If my eyes rolled any harder they'd be popping out of their sockets.
- bogomipz 4y agoImagine what the burn rate is on maintaining a property with 25,0000 square feet of living space that sits on 4.5 acres of hilltop land in place that gets quite hot and is currently experiencing a mega drought.
- whymauri 4y agothis man bought a minecraft home for 133M dollars
- boeingUH60 4y agoI'm a regular reader of high-end real estate blogs, so frequently see these types of purchases. I don't begrudge anyone for being wealthy (so far they made money legally and "ethically"), but I like imagining what I could alternatively do with such sums. For example, look at this beautiful school campus in Russia - https://archive.ph/z5x01/26aa0da221582b152ab472fafafe811a483bac91.jpg https://archive.ph/z5x01/26aa0da221582b152ab472fafafe811a483.... It was built at cost of $80 million [1]. But, somewhere across the world, someone spends way more than that on an individual home. It gets more real than that...Marc Andreessen (also a major Coinbase shareholder) spent $177 million on a Malibu manse, dropped $45 million on a second one, and $34 million on a third one [2]...Jeez 1- https://archive.ph/z5x01 https://archive.ph/z5x01 2 - https://www.dirt.com/gallery/moguls/tech/marc-andreessen-house-paradise-cove-malibu-1203478595/ https://www.dirt.com/gallery/moguls/tech/marc-andreessen-hou...
- MattGaiser 4y agoMostly blame taking.
- q1w2 4y agoHis accountability comes in the form of the drop in price of the shares of the company. That is the ultimate accountability for any CEO or other shareholder.
- andyjohnson0 4y agoHis net worth was about $2.4 billion. Coinbase is currently down ~3.5% on the day. So his net worth is now about £2.3 billion†. I don't see that inconveniencing him much. † Or maybe a bit more if he was foolish enough to hold some of it in crypto.